In our class discussions also in one of the in-class activities Rubric for Evaluating Online Asynchronous Discussion was discussed. Here are some criteria I found would be useful....
1. Did the learner posted adequate number of responses?
For obvious reason. Eventually students have to be evaluated and would receive a grade.
2. Did the learner’s reference reading materials demonstrate knowledge of the subject?
A good, reliable, and bona-fide source has no substitute in knowledge building.
3. Did the learner use appropriate examples?
Examples would cause learners to think critically and would give a clear view of the subject matter.
4. Did the learner demonstrate some logical thinking?
5. Did the learner participate online in a timely manner?
6. Did the learner build social rapport by engaging other learners with her post?
7. Did the learner structure statements well and demonstrate use of grammar?
8. Did the learner’s discussion demonstrate scholarly aptitude?
9. Did the learner’s discussions raise creative and/or original concepts that participants freely argued/debated/discussed?
10. Did the learner’s quality of the responses match the level of instruction?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment